Voluntary and Normative DriversBUYERS FORUMS/CLUBS
Lever last updated: 14 September 2026
A shared body providing pooled expertise and services to organisations buying removals.
Cost
Very low to Low
Members or sponsors pay for the shared service, including specialists, supplier assessments, training and contracting support. An existing forum needs little new expenditure; a dedicated service needs continuing staff and external expertise. Payments for removal units are separate purchasing costs, even when arranged through the club.
Complexity
Low to Medium
A learning forum can use an existing association and membership terms. A service supporting transactions needs technical reviewers, conflict-of-interest controls, confidential information procedures and clear authority to negotiate or sign for members, adding specialist administrative capability.
Timeline
Very short to Short
An established network can help members complete a first purchase within a year. A new facility may need one to two years to recruit specialists, assess projects and arrange contracts that members can use.
Integrity, Transparency & MRV
Innovation & Cost Reduction
Social & Environmental Safeguards
Energy, Transport & Storage Infrastructure
Inputs & Capacity
Demand Formation
Bankability and Cost of Capital
Policy Architecture & Coordination
Overview
A buyers club provides shared expertise and services to organisations that want to purchase carbon removals. Its organiser or founding members fund specialists, training and common tools so each buyer does not have to build a full technical and contracting team. A basic forum helps members compare methods and learn from one another; a more developed service assesses suppliers, assembles portfolio options and helps negotiate purchases. Members approve and fund their purchases, signing themselves or explicitly authorising a facility to act for them. The lever is operating that shared service. Membership gives access to support; it creates no purchase obligation until a buyer accepts one.
Key Considerations
The organiser should define which services the club provides, who pays for them and whether it can sign contracts for members. Membership criteria can require a purchasing plan or active participation without excluding smaller buyers that need support. Independent technical partners can assess removal quality and project safeguards, while published selection rules limit conflicts when the organiser also sells credits. Members need clear arrangements for confidential information, ownership of shared assessments and supplier access. Joint negotiations must respect competition law, especially when participants exchange prices, volumes or future purchasing plans.
Opportunities
Shared expertise can help a small or inexperienced buyer make a credible first purchase with less repeated research and negotiation. Common assessment tools let members compare project evidence and ask suppliers consistent questions about measurement, storage and delivery. Suppliers can reach several informed customers through one process, while buyers can choose a portfolio that spreads exposure across projects. These efficiencies can help approved budgets become actual removal purchases. Experience from completed transactions can also give the club useful evidence to raise with policymakers and certification bodies, rather than treating membership numbers as market demand.
Risks
A club can absorb members' time and fees without leading to useful purchasing decisions. Different quality preferences may prevent a shared assessment from meeting individual buyers' needs. If the organiser also sells credits, conflicts can bias which suppliers are presented; concentrated buyer power can also exclude smaller providers or press prices below sustainable costs. Members may overstate their climate action by presenting club membership as if it were a purchase. Transparent services, selection procedures and reporting are needed to keep those risks visible.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The organiser should assess whether members become better able to compare suppliers and negotiate contracts, using procurement time, costs and member feedback alongside purchases facilitated and verified delivery. Purchases arranged through the club should be separated from unrelated member transactions. Supplier participation and independent review of shared assessments can reveal exclusion or quality problems. Those findings should guide changes to services, membership fees and project-selection procedures rather than treating growth in membership as sufficient evidence of success.
Stakeholder Engagement
The organiser should recruit initial buyers able to sustain the club alongside smaller participants with practical purchasing needs. Independent technical partners can check supplier evidence, while suppliers should have a transparent route to present it without buying preferred access. Public observers can connect lessons to policy. Legal advisers should assess competition and procurement constraints before members share commercial information or negotiate together.
Governance Levels
Public authorities and international institutions can operate buyer-support platforms under their programme powers. Companies and foundations can establish them directly, while members can jointly fund and govern the service. The organiser controls the training, assessment and transaction support it provides. Members retain their purchasing decisions unless they expressly authorise an operator to act for them. Observing meetings, promoting membership or funding another organisation without controlling delivery are supporting roles.
Implementation Strategies
Founding members should define their purchasing needs and choose the services the club will provide. The organiser should set participation expectations, disclose commercial interests and recruit smaller buyers alongside members able to support the initial operating budget.
The club should agree a charter and common quality principles, then provide practical training on methods, contracts and delivery risks. Independent specialists can support members that lack their own assessment teams.
The organiser should build shared supplier information and assessment tools using transparent inclusion rules. Members should agree confidentiality and competition-law controls before sharing sensitive purchasing plans or negotiating jointly.
Where the club arranges procurement, members should agree who signs, pays and receives units, and who bears delivery failure. Reporting should distinguish facilitated purchases from general membership and members' unrelated transactions.
Members should agree continuing funding, entry and exit rules, and ownership of shared assessments. Supplier feedback and periodic independent review can identify exclusion, conflicts or quality problems as the club expands.
Case Studies
NextGen CDR Facility
NextGen CDR Facility provides project assessment, portfolio selection and purchasing arrangements for companies seeking permanent removals. It is backed by climate-services company South Pole and Japanese trading company Mitsubishi Corporation, with founding buyers including Boston Consulting Group, LGT, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Swiss Re and UBS. Buyers obtain specialist assessment and contracting support without building each function themselves. NextGen also arranges a diversified removal portfolio with an average target price of USD 200 per tonne. In March 2025, Japanese banking group Mizuho joined and concluded a long-term purchase agreement. That agreement establishes a purchase commitment in addition to participation in shared services. Units purchased through NextGen are to be retired in a public registry; its target price and contracts do not establish completed removal delivery.
EU CRCF Buyers Club
The European Commission's EU CRCF Buyers Club is a voluntary platform intended to connect purchasers with suppliers certified under the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation. Announced in November 2025, with initial details presented in May 2026, it covers permanent removals and carbon farming. In its 2026 model, the Commission helps bring participants together while buyers conduct the final project checks and make contracting decisions. Shared assessment tools and contract templates are planned as the platform develops. The aim is to make eligible supply easier to find and reduce the work needed to enter the market. Initial permanent-removal purchases are targeted for December 2026; at this review date they remain a future milestone, rather than a completed Commission-funded purchase.
More Voluntary and Normative Drivers

Awareness Campaigns and Public Engagement
Public education activities giving people information about carbon removal and its trade-offs.
Cost
Very low to Medium
Complexity
Very low to Medium
Timeline
Very short to Medium
Integrity, Transparency & MRV
1–2Innovation & Cost Reduction
N/ASocial & Environmental Safeguards
2–3Energy, Transport & Storage Infrastructure
N/AInputs & Capacity
N/ADemand Formation
1–2Bankability and Cost of Capital
N/APolicy Architecture & Coordination
1–2
Voluntary Industry Codes and Participation Requirements
An industry-run code of conduct that participating firms agree to follow.
Cost
Very low to Low
Complexity
Low to Medium
Timeline
Very short to Medium
Integrity, Transparency & MRV
1–3Innovation & Cost Reduction
N/ASocial & Environmental Safeguards
1–3Energy, Transport & Storage Infrastructure
N/AInputs & Capacity
N/ADemand Formation
1–2Bankability and Cost of Capital
N/APolicy Architecture & Coordination
1–3
Internal Carbon Fees and Shadow Pricing
An internal price on emissions that shapes an organisation's own investment decisions.
Cost
Very low to High
Complexity
Very low to Medium
Timeline
Very short to Short
Integrity, Transparency & MRV
1–2Innovation & Cost Reduction
1–2Social & Environmental Safeguards
1–2Energy, Transport & Storage Infrastructure
N/AInputs & Capacity
N/ADemand Formation
1–4Bankability and Cost of Capital
1–3Policy Architecture & Coordination
1–2©2026 Alexander Mäkelä and Carbon Gap.
Except where otherwise indicated, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.
Headline and barrier scores based on Carbon Gap analysis.